Academy plans anger Burntwood School parents

Academy plans anger Burntwood School parents Academy plans anger Burntwood School parents

Plans to turn a school into an academy have sparked anger from a group of parents.

Burntwood School, in Burntwood Lane, Earlsfield, told parents in December proposals were in place to get academy status for the school in 2013.

The school, which has foundation status and scored a 'Good' in its latest Ofsted inspection, would no longer be controlled by the council but directly by the Department for Education (DfE).

A decision is due to be approved by a panel of governors next week.

Parents have voiced concerns, fearing the impact it will have on their children's education.

Alison Higgs, who has a 14-year-old daughter at the school, said: "We believe the quality of education will be affected. Schools can employ unqualified teachers instead of more experienced teachers.

"They can set their own terms and conditions. We are worried financial issues will take priority and will have a negative impact on our daughter's education."

The social worker, of Brixton Hill, said she wants to attend the governor's meeting and present her own survey results gathered from leafleting outside the school.

Her results found about 80 per cent of year 11 parents did not want it to become an academy.

Feedback from a consultation form on the school's website said students, staff and parents were consulted and 1735 forms were posted.

A reply to a parent asking what would happen if it did not become an academy on the feedback form said: "We cannot predict the future.

"However, in the short term, the school will have less money to spend on the students and more parents may be concerned that we have not converted like almost every other Wandsworth School and wonder why."

Helen Dorfman, principal, said: "A small number of parents organised an additional meeting in opposition to the proposal and their views are also being considered.

"This group has asked to make a presentation at the governing body meeting, however, these parents have expressed their views at meetings governors have attended.

"The governing body is always concerned to make decisions in the best interests of the school."

Comments(3)

Emski1 says...
2:53pm Wed 13 Feb 13

I hope that the teachers at Burntwood have already pointed out to the Principal the error in her use of the English language. Her use of the word 'however' in the second sentence quoted from her statement as if it were a conjunction is an egregious mistake, of a kind that I hope is corrected as a matter of course if it is found in students' work. It is worrying that it was allowed to pass in a public statement from the school.

janee says...
10:55pm Wed 13 Feb 13

There is an assumption that because more money goes directly to the school, rather than to pay for services to the LEA, that the school will be better of. However, I did a Freedom of Information request to schools converting to academy status in Suffolk and found that the insurance costs for schools doubled or worse and the licence fees for software also increased. For example, one school reported paying £8,305 before it became an academy and £25,103.49 using the same company after it became an academy.

One Wandsworth school paid £5000 for its share of the licence with Wandworth and £16,000 as an academy.

I wonder if the Burntwood governors have got quotes.

janee says...
2:35pm Thu 14 Feb 13

Sorry "off" - it was a typo!
It is worth checking out the National Audit Office's warnings about the financial stability of the academy programme. http://www.nao.org.u
k/publications/1213/
academies_expansion.
aspx
Michael Wilshaw of Ofsted, an enthusiast of the academies programme, also seems to recognise the risks:
http://www.localgov.
co.uk/index.cfm?meth
od=news.detail&id=10
8867

click2find

About cookies

We want you to enjoy your visit to our website. That's why we use cookies to enhance your experience. By staying on our website you agree to our use of cookies. Find out more about the cookies we use.

I agree