Children's wards at Kingston, St Helier, and Croydon hospitals could close

The Children's ward at Queen Mary's Hospital for Children, St Helier Hospital The Children's ward at Queen Mary's Hospital for Children, St Helier Hospital

Children's wards at three hospitals in SW London have been earmarked for closure under an NHS review.

St Helier, Kingston and Croydon University hospitals are all set to lose their inpatient paediatric care as part of NHS SW London's Better Services Better Value (BSBV) review into healthcare in the region.

It emerged this week healthcare professionals carrying out a review of children's services are to present the recommendation to health bosses later this month that children's wards at three SW London hospitals close.

Proposals seen by this newspaper show the clinical working group review will recommend only one specialist impatient childrens' ward in SW London, and this should be St George’s Hospital, given its role as a major acute hospital including a major trauma centre.

The clinical working group is recommending the changes because of a shortage of paediatricians locally and nationally, which they say means children's wards are not sustainable across the four hospitals.

If the proposals are approved St Helier would lose its 18 bed children's ward, Croydon its 12 bed ward, and Kingston would also lose its children's ward.

Children needing overnight treatment would be sent to St George's Hospital.

The recommendation is part of the same review that has earmarked St Helier to lose its accident and emergency (A&E) and maternity departments.

If approved, St Helier would also lose its children's A&E. Croydon, Kingston and St George's hospitals would keep specialist children's A&E departments.

Each hospital with an A&E should have paediatric assessment unit (PAU) where children could stay for up to 24 hours while they are assessed.

The proposals have raised serious questions about the long-term future of Epsom and St Helier University Hospital Trust's dedicated children's hospital Queen Mary's Hospital for Children, where St Helier's children's ward is based.

Geoff Martin, a spokesman for health watchdog London Health Emergency, raised concerns about the plans.

He said: "This is another example of the systematic salami slicing of services that are vital to communities, that in term will affect their financial viability, and see further services disappear.

"NHS bosses say they want to provide more services closer to people's homes but this will make often very sick children and their parents travel even further to receive treatment."

Bianca Effemey, co-founder of a children’s cancer charity which has invested £200,000 into improving childrens wards in SW London, criticised the recommendation.

She said: “I would be dead against this. It is terribly important to all parents who have children and get treated. It [St George’s Hospital] is too far for them to go.”

A spokeswoman for Kingston Hospital said in a statement: “The debate about children's services in south west London is still on-going and doctors and nurses from within Kingston Hospital have strong views about what is the best option for children's services in south west London.

“We continue to be committed to discussing these important issues over the coming weeks so that together we can propose a model to deliver the best care for all of our patients.”

A spokeswoman for Croydon Health Services said: "The BSBV Programme Board have the responsibility of endorsing the recommendations of working groups and, at this stage, no decisions have yet been made about paediatric care in South West London.

"It is therefore too soon to comment on what this means for Croydon.

"BSBV is a clinically led review and clinicians from Croydon have helped to develop the recommendations."

"Local people will be invited to take part in a consultation later this year when the options have been fully assessed and we encourage all local people to take part."

A BSBV spokesman said: "The children’s services clinical working group has completed its report, but this has not yet been approved by the BSBV Programme Board. We expect it to be approved and formally published later this month."

Comments(13)

David7 says...
2:28pm Tue 15 May 12

Once again, a committee led by acolytes of St George’s Hospital recommends closures everywhere but... St George’s.

Electricmum says...
2:47pm Tue 15 May 12

It is a shame that a children's dedicated unit at St Helier Hospital, which offers such important and great care much higher than anywhere else locally should face closure.
So much history is behind the name of Queen Mary's hospital and so easy to wipe it! its a shame! and so very wrong.

Giles C says...
3:50pm Tue 15 May 12

Ok so who still believes that £219million is going to be spent on St Helier...the same people who believe the Euro is a success? Yes youve guessed it your 2 lib dem mps. They have started another petition so that people can feel reassured...i dont think so. Burstow would get a great deal of respect locally if he were to resign his government position to fight this but maybe he wont because he really knows deep down its futile.

mr-bjp says...
4:19pm Tue 15 May 12

The NHS should change the name of SW London's Better Services Better Value. I can't see anything that their cuts are doing to making anything better, in fact it's going to create bottle-necks at other hospitals resulting in potential loss of life. But then again Dave's government don't care about that do they?

David7 says...
5:08pm Tue 15 May 12

They have already changed the name to BSBV – from Better Services Closer to Home. Obviously they couldn’t quite fulfil that brief, unless you really can get from Carshalton to Kingston in six minutes.

David7 says...
6:33pm Tue 15 May 12

I think they’re closing the whole hospital, one bit at a time.

theavengers says...
6:31am Wed 16 May 12

Conservatives are all about money, lives don't count. Kids can be shuffled far away from parents for treatment during a scary time for them and no one cares. No A&E would mean delays in treatment and more unnecessary deaths...maybe even your loved one. Not the conservatives, they'll always have their families privately taken care of on our money. Human life is cheap with the conservatives. Take our jobs, our homes, our lives: it's all about the end pound for the richest of society.

Tony from Surbiton says...
9:17am Wed 16 May 12

theavengers wrote:
Conservatives are all about money, lives don't count. Kids can be shuffled far away from parents for treatment during a scary time for them and no one cares. No A&E would mean delays in treatment and more unnecessary deaths...maybe even your loved one. Not the conservatives, they'll always have their families privately taken care of on our money. Human life is cheap with the conservatives. Take our jobs, our homes, our lives: it's all about the end pound for the richest of society.
Grow up theavengers, more money is being spent on the NHS every year in real terms. Efficiency savings made by moving services to fewer hospitals will mean more money for saving lives. With people living ever longer, this seems perfectly proper to me.

lilacgeorge says...
11:50am Wed 16 May 12

Tony from Surbiton wrote:
theavengers wrote:
Conservatives are all about money, lives don't count. Kids can be shuffled far away from parents for treatment during a scary time for them and no one cares. No A&E would mean delays in treatment and more unnecessary deaths...maybe even your loved one. Not the conservatives, they'll always have their families privately taken care of on our money. Human life is cheap with the conservatives. Take our jobs, our homes, our lives: it's all about the end pound for the richest of society.
Grow up theavengers, more money is being spent on the NHS every year in real terms. Efficiency savings made by moving services to fewer hospitals will mean more money for saving lives. With people living ever longer, this seems perfectly proper to me.
Well Tony, I trust you'll be happy to pay your taxes to keep myself & other children's nurses at QM on the dole??? Thanks for your support, hold on....from Surbiton...and there you go! Doesn't affect you so what do you care???? QM is a fantastic hospital & it will be a great shame to lose it :(

kazza76 says...
4:20pm Wed 16 May 12

well said lilac george, clearly mr im from surbiton doesnt have a clue, i have 2 children and no transport. cutting services in our area is going to put pressure on other local hospitals and more lives will be at risk. all hospitals struggle and more pressure will add to this. so tony clearly you dont have a clue my love.

Michael Pantlin says...
4:49pm Wed 16 May 12

Tony from Surbiton wrote:
theavengers wrote:
Conservatives are all about money, lives don't count. Kids can be shuffled far away from parents for treatment during a scary time for them and no one cares. No A&E would mean delays in treatment and more unnecessary deaths...maybe even your loved one. Not the conservatives, they'll always have their families privately taken care of on our money. Human life is cheap with the conservatives. Take our jobs, our homes, our lives: it's all about the end pound for the richest of society.
Grow up theavengers, more money is being spent on the NHS every year in real terms. Efficiency savings made by moving services to fewer hospitals will mean more money for saving lives. With people living ever longer, this seems perfectly proper to me.
Tony of Surbiton your comment is so outrageous that you must have a vested interest which please declare. Either that or you are brainwashed. You would go to Kingston Hospital anyway and not have to struggle in an ambulance all the way through the traffic gridlock to St. George's. When the plotters have concentrated everything crammed on to the St. George's site and the hospital is cordoned off for a fire, flood, terrorist action or alert, infectious disease control, or dealing with a major incident train or plane crash, then NHS services in SW London will be well and truly phooked.

Eeyore79 says...
6:18pm Wed 16 May 12

This is just getting out of hand now! No a&e, maternity or children's department! Let's just say us London borough of Sutton residents are doomed for if we have a medical emergency! Maybe they should close the borough full stop ship us all out then we won't have to worry about medical treatment or a school place!

Michael Pantlin says...
6:53pm Wed 16 May 12

Tony from Surbiton wrote:
theavengers wrote:
Conservatives are all about money, lives don't count. Kids can be shuffled far away from parents for treatment during a scary time for them and no one cares. No A&E would mean delays in treatment and more unnecessary deaths...maybe even your loved one. Not the conservatives, they'll always have their families privately taken care of on our money. Human life is cheap with the conservatives. Take our jobs, our homes, our lives: it's all about the end pound for the richest of society.
Grow up theavengers, more money is being spent on the NHS every year in real terms. Efficiency savings made by moving services to fewer hospitals will mean more money for saving lives. With people living ever longer, this seems perfectly proper to me.
One of the Coalition's current Mantras is that they have to deal with a growing elderly population as people are living longer. Maybe the closure of St. Helier Hospital piece by piece and fouling the air with the incinerator is Spiv Dave's and Glove Puppet Clegg's policy for dealing with it by reducing the numbers as well as creating more space for the illegals they can't keep out and refuse to expel on EU instructions.

click2find

About cookies

We want you to enjoy your visit to our website. That's why we use cookies to enhance your experience. By staying on our website you agree to our use of cookies. Find out more about the cookies we use.

I agree