Lambeth Council approved the highest possible rise in council tax last night (February 12), while setting aside a quarter of a million to fight the climate crisis.

A council tax hike of 3.99 per cent was approved, which includes a two per cent adult social care precept; a rise of 2.7 per cent in council tenant rent was agreed in January.

Residents services were cut by nearly £2.5 million out of nearly £2.9 million in total cuts for 2020/21.

Half a million pound was set aside to tackle youth violence, bringing the fund to £1 million.

Part of the budget for fighting the climate emergency involves setting up a citizens’ assembly “to work with residents on a plan to significantly reduce carbon emissions across the borough”.

A one per cent social value levy will be applied to third party contracts to bring in £1.2 million for the youth opportunity fund.

Councillor Andy Wilson, cabinet member for finance and performance, said the future of funding was uncertain.  

He said: “The funding settlement was only agreed for one additional year but even that hasn’t even been finally approved as the debate that was supposed to happen this morning has now been moved to a few weeks later. 

“So we actually don’t have the final agreed figures to agree the budget for the following year.”

He added: “The message is clear, Tory austerity is not over. 

“Funding increases from central Government represent a drop in the ocean – a very modest four per cent increase nationally marks a reduction of 63 per cent in the last ten years.  

“This small rise does nothing to address the increase in demand in areas like special needs, school funding and children’s and adult social care.” 

The schools block allocation increased by £1.2m “but this is one of the lowest increases in the country, at a time when school funding is being increased”, according to the budget report.

Conservative and Green alternative budgets were rejected.

The Greens proposed increasing reserves to 8.2 per cent, while cutting communications and council allowances “in order to add five new staff members to the council procurement team”.

They also proposed a workplace parking levy.

Green Cllr Jonathan Bartley called for better monitoring of financial reports after mistakes were missed by cabinet.

“The Green group identified mistakes in the figures for the reserves passed by November’s cabinet.

“This report was signed off by the strategic director, the director of finance, the cabinet member for finance and the whole cabinet.

“It also went to scrutiny where this was not picked up either.

“While these mistakes do not impact the overall budget, it is worrying because they should have been immediately visible at a cursory glance.

“We need to be sure that our processes and procedures will pick those mistakes up,” he said.

He said the council should “end the sale of short-life council homes”, adding that number of council homes sold since 2010 has reached more than 300, outside right-to-buy.

“Since 2011 it has cost Lambeth tax payers over £1.5 million in staff and legal fees.

“Thanks to work by the people’s audit we now know where these council homes have gone.

Buyers have been based in Spain, Singapore, Malaysia, Taiwan and United Arab Emirates

“They have gone to offshore developers registered in the British Virgin Islands, Hong Kong, the Isle of Man, and Kuwait. They’ve also gone to buy-to-let landlords,” he said.

The Conservative alternative budget proposed to reduce the council tax hike by one per cent and put £2.5 million into the climate emergency action plan, ten times what was proposed by Labour.

It included cuts of £10 million to shared services and £1 million to libraries.

Conservative Cllr Tim Briggs said his alternative budget was seeking to “hard bake the procedures that will enable you to exercise enough corporate grit to be able to implement those changes that all of the parties and all of the councilors say they want”.

“You can’t do what you’re claiming to do,” he said, adding: “For example with the climate emergency actions plan […] it needs to set out quantitative analysis, not just qualitive ‘we need to do this because its good’ because that’s so vague it just gets lost.

“We need to determine specific actions, we need to calculate their costs, we need to talk about the carbon reduction impact, we need to talk about the co-benefits.

“We need to talk about the timeline and which lead officers are responsible for doing these things.”

He also urged that a centralised commercial contracts team be created and that Lambeth start sharing work with other councils.